TIEC, trauma capacity, and the moral priority of surrogate decision makers in futility disputes

TIEC, trauma capacity, and the moral priority of surrogate decision makers in futility disputes
The Journal of Clinical Ethics; by Autumn Fiester; Spring 2025
In the past 15 years, trauma-informed care (TIC) has evolved as a new paradigm in healthcare that recognizes the impact of past traumas on patients' and families' healthcare experience while seeking to avoid inducing new trauma during clinical care. A recent paper by Lanphier and Anani extends TIC principles to healthcare ethics consultation (HEC) in what they label "trauma-informed ethics consultation" (TIEC), which calls for the "addition of trauma informed awareness, training, and skill in clinical ethics consultation." While Lanphier and Anani claim that TIEC is "novel, but not radical" because it builds on the approach to HEC endorsed by the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, I believe that TIEC has radical implications, particularly regarding ethical obligations to surrogate decision makers (SDMs). Given what I call the SDM's "trauma capacity," I argue that TIEC accords moral priority to SDMs over patients in certain types of end-of-life cases, particularly futility disputes, which is a radical departure from the conventional HEC approach to SDMs.