Everyday ethics or deference to expertise: experiences of pediatric palliative care teams with ethics consultancy

Everyday ethics or deference to expertise: experiences of pediatric palliative care teams with ethics consultancy
Journal of Palliative Medicine; Anessa M Foxwell, Connie M Ulrich, Jennifer K Walter, Meaghann S Weaver; 7/24
Little is known about the extent to which pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians are engaged in ethics consults or how they perceive interactions with ethics consultants. Online survey distributed to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics and American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Care pediatric and ethics section and special interest groups in the United States. Eighty-six responses were obtained (response rate 45%) from PPC teams in 70 different children's hospitals located in 34 states. Almost all (97%) reported a functional ethics consult service such that PPC is not expected to meet the ethics need of the institution. A person involved on the PPC team also performed ethics consults in half (49%) of the settings, predominantly the PPC physician. Most respondents who perceive PPC teams engage in ethics-relevant work as part of their everyday PPC work. Formal ethics training was lacking among PPC members involved in ethics consults with few ethics degrees (15%), certifications (6%), or fellowships (2%). Discord (67%), conflict (49%), limitations to treatment (48%), and distress (41%) were cited as the most frequent reasons for which PPC teams consult ethics. PPC respondents identified role clarity, coordinated engagement, timely presence, and open communication as strong PHCE consultant practices. Conclusions: PPC team members performing ethics consults may benefit from additional ethics education and training.