Evaluation of reporting of race and ethnicity in hospice and palliative care research

Evaluation of reporting of race and ethnicity in hospice and palliative care research
Journal of Palliative Medicine; Kimberly S Johnson, Karen Bullock, Cardinale B Smith, Deborah B Ejem, Nadine J Barrett, A'mie Preston, Kenisha Bethea, Marisette Hasan, Ramona L Rhodes; 5/25
The disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized communities due to structural racism has led to an increased focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion in medical literature. Among the eligible articles reviewed, there were 48 unique racial and ethnic categories [and] the most common groups specified were White (N = 77), Black (N = 52), and Hispanic/Latino (N = 36). Over half of articles (n = 53, 60.2%) combined minoritized groups into a nonspecific category (e.g., "other"), and 30 (34.1%) articles specified White populations alone or White populations with a nonspecific category for other groups. Seventeen (19.3%) articles included over 90% White participants, and only 3 (3.4%) articles had a minority health or health disparity focus. In this review of high impact, practice changing articles, the lack of appropriate representation of minoritized racial and ethnic groups, frequent use of non-standard categories to describe race and ethnicity, and the small number of articles focused on health disparities raise concerns about the generalizability of research findings, equity in research processes, and attention to populations that experience disparities in palliative care outcomes.